西方国家完整篇三蹦子,飞行汽车的最好攻克方位!

文 /
2019-10-08 23:35

对三蹦子的热情探讨,早已不断了1周,到如今好像关注度都还没以往。有比较严重看中的,也是不看中的。不看中的,通常都觉得三蹦子长相太低挡,并且都没有防水防雨隔热保温对策;基本上没什么上空装甲安全防护工作能力。我觉得三蹦子这类旋翼机,第二次世界大战期内就早已出現。比靠谱直升飞机的产品化要早的多。并且第二次世界大战期内的旋翼机都不全是2片旋翼,3片、4片的常有。只不过是2片旋翼使用方便,要是并不是超重型旋翼机升力早已充足。

而旋翼再增加或是增加,就背驰了旋翼机轻巧兼气体驱动力风险性较小的初心。相对性优点就沒有轻形旋翼机那麼显著了。对于上空防雨雪天气、上空隔热保温和轻形安全防护的难题,海外许多更高端的三蹦子早已处理了这种难题,只不过是人们展现的国内三蹦子还要追求完美轻巧和便宜。假如不害怕成本费大幅升高,更新改造成海外高端三蹦子也没什么非常的艰难。

三蹦子飞行汽车

如今欧州总有这种成熟期的三蹦子,不仅有详细的隔热保温密封性驾驶室,并且旋翼系统软件可以伸缩,在路面上一切正常路面上行车,就是说一辆汽车高档的复合材料三轮车超级跑车,不占有一切不必要的车子总宽和长短。如果进行旋翼,则就是说一台较为高档的飞行汽车。并且和陆上行车选用同样的驱动力体系,起飞前只必须换一下下档就是说了。可是不管如何伸缩,如何选用高档的复合材料生产制造,如果进行能够航空的彻底体,看了就了解還是1个“加了棚”的三蹦子。如今一提到小车,特别是在是家用小汽车,大部分人的首位反映,全是4轮车四平八稳的汽车行使。可是事实上本茨等最开始创造发明和生产制造的小车,就是说小三轮,和如今的陆上三蹦子基本上一样。小车的出現早已大大的提高了人们社会发展的综合性知识经济。可是人们的先天性不符合,都是促进科技创新的一整天生要素。

在小车出現没多久,就许多人想创造发明这种既能够在陆上上行车,又能够在天上中自由往来的“航空”小车。那样不仅更快、更酷帅并且都还没平时路面拥挤的不便。但是虽然小车到现阶段早已出現了120很多年,飞行汽车依然广泛不被看中;并且都没有普及化。1个很关键的缘故,就是说小车和飞机场的健身运动基本原理有挺大的不一样,假如把小车做的和固定翼飞机或是直升飞机相同繁杂,就必须提升大中型旋翼和固定翼等总宽挺大,外在净重也挺大的附加设备。那样就不可以兼具总宽不足的陆上路面行车和上空的航空;并且起降还务必有专业的飞机场。那样的设备更像传统式的飞机场而并不是小车。如今也许多人用涡喷或是多旋翼保持飞行汽车,可是这种设备的较大1个难题,就是说耗油量率极高。假定航空100千米,那麼耗油量将比传统式的小车路面行车100千米耗油量多N倍。除开极少数人的重口,都没有营销推广的将会。如今来看,在真实攻克反重力装置之前。想以小车的耗油量,保持和小车相同乃至更大的时间。

并且总体安全系数和便捷水平不逊于小车,只需一切正常的路面就能够实际操作的“飞行汽车”,三蹦子将会是惟一能够快速保持的近道。通常家用小汽车满油70升油,能够连续行车大概500千米,而伸缩三蹦子用一样的车用汽油能够航空700千米左右,由于上空航空只能自由落体速度而沒有路面的滑动摩擦力和地貌的波动耗费。起降也只必须较为空余的60米的一般路面就能。从欧美国家的很多年实践活动看来,事故率还大大的小于一般路面。因而无论军工用還是民用型,的确是1个非常好的发展前景。

英文版

English version

The enthusiasm for the three scorpions has been going on for a week, and it seems that attention has not yet passed. There are more serious fancy, but also do not fancy. If you don't look at it, you usually feel that the three scorpions look too low, and there is no waterproof, rainproof and thermal insulation measures; basically there is no armor safety protection ability. I think the rotorcraft of the Three Scorpions has already appeared during the Second World War. It is much earlier than the production of reliable helicopters. And the rotorcraft during the Second World War was not all two rotors, and three and four were common. It's just that the two rotors are easy to use, and if it is not the super-heavy rotorcraft, the lift is already sufficient.

When the rotor is increased or increased, it will sway the initial focus of the rotorcraft's light weight and low gas drive force. The relative advantage is not as significant as the light rotorcraft. For the problems of rain and snow weather over the sky, thermal insulation over the sky and light security protection, many of the higher-end three-spots overseas have already dealt with this kind of problem, but it is only the domestic three-scorpion that is still pursuing perfection and lightness. Cheap. If you are not afraid of a significant increase in cost, it will not be very difficult to upgrade to a high-end three-slice overseas.

Nowadays, there are always three matures in this state of Europe. Not only do you have a detailed insulated and sealed cab, but the rotor system software can be stretched and moved on all normal roads on the road, that is, a high-grade composite material for a car. The tricycle super sports car does not occupy all the unnecessary width and length of the car. If you are making a rotor, it means a more expensive flying car. And the same driving force system is used for the land-going car. It is only necessary to change the lower gear before taking off. However, no matter how to expand and contract, how to use high-grade composite materials for manufacturing, if you can carry out the complete body of aviation, you can see that it is still a "stayed shed" three-scorpion. Nowadays, when it comes to small cars, especially in the case of home cars, the first person of most people reflects that all four-wheeled cars are stable. However, in fact, Bentz and other cars that originally created inventions and manufacturing, that is, the small three rounds, are basically the same as today's land three. The emergence of cars has greatly improved the comprehensive knowledge economy of people's social development. However, people's congenital inconsistency is a natural factor in promoting technological innovation.

Not long after the car appeared, many people wanted to create an "aviation" car that could travel on land and travel freely in the sky. Not only is it faster, more cool, and it’s not as convenient as the road is crowded. However, although the car has already appeared for more than 120 years at this stage, the flying cars are still widely ignored; and they are not universalized. One of the key reasons is that the basic principles of fitness and sports at the airport are quite different. If the car is as complicated as a fixed-wing aircraft or a helicopter, it must be upgraded to a large and medium-sized rotor. Wings and other total equipment are quite large, and the external net weight is also quite large. In this way, it is not possible to have both on-street road traffic and air over the total width; and there must be a professional airport for take-off and landing. Such equipment is more like a traditional airport than a car. Many people today use turbojets or multi-rotors to keep flying cars, but the bigger problem with this type of equipment is that the fuel consumption rate is extremely high. Assuming air 100 kilometers, the fuel consumption will be N times more than the traditional car road driving 100 kilometers. Except for the very few people, there is no marketing promotion. Today, before the real counterattack of anti-gravity devices. I want to keep the same fuel consumption as the car with the fuel consumption of the car.

And the overall safety factor and convenience level is not inferior to the car, just need to operate the "flying car" on all normal roads, the three-spot will be the only near-track that can be quickly maintained. Usually, the home car is full of oil of 70 liters and can drive for about 500 kilometers. The telescopic three-wheeled car can use the same car gasoline to fly about 700 kilometers. Because the air can only freely fall and there is no sliding friction on the road. The fluctuation of force and landform is costly. The take-off and landing must also be more than 60 meters of normal road surface. From many years of practice in Europe and the United States, the accident rate is still much smaller than the average road surface. Therefore, whether it is military or civilian, it is indeed a very good development prospect.

(图/文编译:飞行汽车 http://www.flycar.com.cn/
声明:未经原创作者飞行汽车网允许不得转载本文内容,否则将视为侵权,本站依法保留追究权!

推荐阅读: